New Step by Step Map For speaker production order jurisdiction case law in india
New Step by Step Map For speaker production order jurisdiction case law in india
Blog Article
The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon because of the prosecution against the petitioner and his over mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined with the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated two-12-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
V) During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that hearth-arm injury which was fatal into the deceased was caused because of the petitioner but in support of opinion from the Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is offered over the file and mere ipsi dixit of police isn't binding over the Court.
competent authority and when any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
very long period petitioner wasn't thought of for promotion, meeting from the departmental promotion committee and consider the petitioner (Promotion)
The different roles of case regulation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in the way in which that courts render decisions. Common legislation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale guiding their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the wider legal principles.
ninety six . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's perfectly-settled that when thinking about the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to think about the advantage of all of the eligible candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to these eligible candidates that are found being most meritorious among them. For the reason that petitioner was held to become senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded by the respondent department just to increase favor into the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy over the part of the respondent department.
six. Mere involvement within a heinous offence isn't any ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled with the concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, considering that then he is driving the bars, He's previous non-convict, never involved in almost any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person isn't any more expected for further investigation, therefore, his constant incarceration would not serve any helpful purpose at this stage.
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that the moment the act click here of misconduct is founded as well as the employee is found guilty after due process of legislation, it's the prerogative with the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, away from the varied penalties provided in legislation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed will not be proportionate with the seriousness with the act of misconduct will not be enough however the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in a very structured and lawful method. Read more
The legislation of necessity acknowledged and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called law of necessity..
Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and security. It demonstrates the commitment of the state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of legislation.
[three] For example, in England, the High Court plus the Court of Appeals are each bound by their own previous decisions, however, Because the Practice Statement 1966 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom can deviate from its earlier decisions, Whilst in practice it not often does. A notable example of when the court has overturned its precedent would be the case of R v Jogee, where the Supreme Court with the United Kingdom ruled that it and also the other courts of England and Wales had misapplied the regulation for just about 30 years.
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition into the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Development Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of the electricity grid station in their neighborhood, on designated “green belt” property. The Court listened to the matter as a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) of the Pakistan Constitution gives original jurisdiction towards the Supreme Court to take up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should even be dismissed. Suffice is to watch that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are fully different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case regulation titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held with the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--